← Back to UWTV Archived Content

The Organizational Dilemma of Stewards and Creators: Bridging the Innovation Gap

This program, originating from the University of Washington Television (UWTV) archives, delves into the critical organizational challenges that businesses face when attempting to capitalize on groundbreaking innovations. Based on the research of Harvard Business School professors Rob Austin and Dick Nolan, "Stewards and Creators" explores the disconnect between the individuals who generate innovative ideas ("creators") and those responsible for managing and commercializing them ("stewards"). This content pillar aims to dissect the core issues, provide context to the speakers and their expertise, and offer insights into how organizations can foster better collaboration to unlock the full potential of innovation.

The central question addressed is a recurring one: why do companies consistently fail to fully leverage major innovation opportunities despite significant investments in research and development? Austin and Nolan's framework highlights the fundamental differences in values, priorities, and perspectives between creators and stewards, leading to communication breakdowns and missed opportunities. By understanding these differences and implementing strategies to bridge the gap, organizations can significantly improve their ability to translate innovative ideas into successful products and services.

Program Overview

The Core Problem: Mismatched Value Systems and Communication Barriers

At the heart of the "Stewards and Creators" dilemma lies a fundamental clash of values and priorities. Creators, often scientists, engineers, or designers, are typically driven by a passion for discovery, a desire to push the boundaries of knowledge, and a commitment to creating something new and impactful. Their focus is on the technical aspects of innovation, the elegance of the solution, and the potential for long-term impact.

Stewards, on the other hand, are primarily concerned with the practical considerations of bringing an innovation to market. Their focus is on profitability, return on investment, market share, and competitive advantage. They are often more risk-averse and prioritize short-term gains over long-term potential. This difference in perspective can lead to conflict and misunderstanding, hindering the effective commercialization of innovations.

Consider the classic example of Xerox PARC (Palo Alto Research Center) in the 1970s. PARC was a hotbed of innovation, responsible for developing technologies like the graphical user interface (GUI), the laser printer, and Ethernet. However, Xerox, the parent company, largely failed to capitalize on these innovations, allowing companies like Apple and Microsoft to reap the rewards. This failure can be attributed, in part, to a disconnect between the creators at PARC and the stewards at Xerox headquarters, who were unable to fully appreciate the potential of these groundbreaking technologies.

The communication barriers between creators and stewards can also exacerbate the problem. Creators may struggle to articulate the value of their innovations in terms that stewards can understand. They may be reluctant to compromise on their vision or to accept constraints imposed by market realities. Stewards, in turn, may be dismissive of the technical complexities of the innovation or may fail to provide creators with the resources and support they need to succeed. This breakdown in communication can lead to frustration, resentment, and ultimately, the failure to commercialize promising innovations.

Examples of Mismatched Value Systems

The Speakers: Expertise and Perspectives on Innovation

The "Organizational Dilemma of Stewards and Creators" program features a distinguished panel of experts, each bringing a unique perspective to the discussion of innovation and its management.

The collective expertise of these speakers provides a comprehensive overview of the organizational, technological, and financial aspects of innovation. Their insights are valuable for anyone seeking to understand the challenges of commercializing innovation and the strategies that organizations can use to overcome these challenges.

The Role of the Washington Research Foundation

The Washington Research Foundation (WRF), led by Ron Howell at the time of this symposium, plays a vital role in bridging the gap between academic research and commercial application. WRF provides funding, licensing expertise, and mentorship to researchers at universities and research institutions in Washington State. Their mission is to translate promising discoveries into products and services that benefit society. By supporting early-stage research and providing the resources needed to commercialize innovations, WRF helps to foster a vibrant innovation ecosystem in the state of Washington.

Strategies for Bridging the Gap: Fostering Collaboration and Communication

Overcoming the "Stewards and Creators" dilemma requires a concerted effort to foster collaboration and communication between these two groups. Organizations must create an environment where creators feel valued and supported, and where stewards understand and appreciate the potential of innovation.

One key strategy is to establish clear communication channels and processes that facilitate the exchange of information between creators and stewards. This can involve creating cross-functional teams, holding regular meetings, and using collaborative software tools to share ideas and feedback. It is also important to provide training to both creators and stewards on how to communicate effectively with each other, taking into account their different perspectives and priorities.

Another important strategy is to align incentives and rewards to encourage collaboration and innovation. This can involve tying compensation to the successful commercialization of innovations, recognizing and rewarding collaborative efforts, and creating opportunities for creators and stewards to share in the financial success of their innovations. It is also important to create a culture that values both creativity and practicality, recognizing that both are essential for successful innovation.

Furthermore, organizations should consider creating dedicated innovation units or incubators that provide a supportive environment for creators to develop and test their ideas. These units can be staffed with individuals who have a deep understanding of both the technical and business aspects of innovation, and who can act as translators between creators and stewards. By providing creators with the resources and support they need to succeed, organizations can increase the likelihood that their innovations will be successfully commercialized.

Specific Strategies for Improved Collaboration

The Role of Leadership: Setting the Tone for Innovation

Ultimately, the success of any effort to bridge the "Stewards and Creators" gap depends on the leadership of the organization. Leaders must set the tone for innovation by creating a culture that values both creativity and practicality, and by providing the resources and support needed to foster collaboration and communication.

Leaders must also be willing to take risks and to challenge conventional wisdom. Innovation often involves disrupting existing business models and challenging established practices. Leaders must be willing to embrace this disruption and to support those who are pushing the boundaries of what is possible.

Furthermore, leaders must be able to communicate a clear vision for innovation and to inspire both creators and stewards to work together towards a common goal. This vision should be ambitious but achievable, and it should be aligned with the overall strategic goals of the organization. By providing a clear sense of purpose and direction, leaders can help to motivate and focus the efforts of both creators and stewards.

Finally, leaders must be willing to learn from their mistakes and to adapt their strategies as needed. Innovation is an iterative process, and there will inevitably be setbacks and failures along the way. Leaders must be able to learn from these experiences and to use them to improve their approach to innovation.

Key Leadership Qualities for Fostering Innovation

The Broader Context: Innovation Ecosystems and Regional Development

The "Organizational Dilemma of Stewards and Creators" is not just a challenge for individual companies; it is also a challenge for regional and national economies. Innovation is a key driver of economic growth and competitiveness, and regions that are able to foster a vibrant innovation ecosystem are more likely to attract investment, create jobs, and improve the quality of life for their citizens.

An innovation ecosystem is a complex network of actors, including universities, research institutions, companies, investors, and government agencies, that work together to generate and commercialize new ideas. A healthy innovation ecosystem provides a supportive environment for entrepreneurs and innovators, making it easier for them to access funding, expertise, and resources.

The Seattle region, the location of the Seattle Innovation Symposium, has a long history of innovation, driven by companies like Boeing, Microsoft, and Amazon. The region also has a strong network of universities and research institutions, including the University of Washington, which play a key role in generating new ideas and training the next generation of innovators. The Washington Research Foundation, as discussed earlier, is a crucial component of this ecosystem, providing funding and support to researchers at these institutions.

Governments can play a key role in fostering innovation ecosystems by investing in research and development, providing tax incentives for innovation, and creating a regulatory environment that is conducive to innovation. They can also support the development of infrastructure, such as high-speed internet access, that is essential for innovation.

Key Components of a Healthy Innovation Ecosystem

Looking Ahead: The Future of Innovation Management

The "Organizational Dilemma of Stewards and Creators" remains a relevant challenge in today's rapidly changing business environment. As technology continues to evolve and new industries emerge, the ability to effectively manage innovation will become even more critical for organizations to succeed.

One trend that is likely to shape the future of innovation management is the increasing importance of open innovation. Open innovation involves collaborating with external partners, such as customers, suppliers, and other companies, to generate and commercialize new ideas. By opening up their innovation processes, organizations can tap into a wider range of expertise and resources, and accelerate the pace of innovation.

Another trend that is likely to shape the future of innovation management is the increasing use of data analytics and artificial intelligence (AI). Data analytics can be used to identify promising areas for innovation, to track the progress of innovation projects, and to measure the impact of innovation on business performance. AI can be used to automate certain aspects of the innovation process, such as idea generation and evaluation.

Finally, the future of innovation management will likely be shaped by the increasing importance of sustainability. As the world faces growing environmental and social challenges, organizations will need to find ways to innovate in a sustainable manner. This will require a shift in mindset, from focusing solely on economic performance to considering the environmental and social impact of innovation.

Key Trends Shaping the Future of Innovation Management

Conclusion

The "Organizational Dilemma of Stewards and Creators" highlights a fundamental challenge in managing innovation: bridging the gap between those who create new ideas and those who are responsible for commercializing them. By understanding the differences in values, priorities, and perspectives between creators and stewards, and by implementing strategies to foster collaboration and communication, organizations can significantly improve their ability to translate innovative ideas into successful products and services. The insights shared by Robert Austin, Ron Howell, Karen Brown, Krank Coker, and Jonathan Roberts in the UWTV program remain relevant and valuable for anyone seeking to understand and address this critical challenge.